By Ari Melber – The short answer is no – unless evidence emerges that tangibly links the suspect to enemy forces, like al Qaeda, that are listed in the September 11, 2001 authorization of force. This is the main source of the administration’s war powers.
There are also many strong reasons why it would be bad policy – even if it were legal. Revoking the constitutional rights of American citizens, on American soil, based on a suspected crime, opens the door to a two-tiered justice system and executive abuse. more> http://tinyurl.com/bsh344c
Related>
- Boston Marathon Bombings, Brookings Institution
- For American-Muslims, dread, David Rohde, Reuters
- Caught on camera: Boston manhunt sparks privacy debate, Jordy Yager and Jeremy Herb, Hill
- Lawmakers question FBI handling of Boston terror attack suspect, Mike Lillis, Hill
- Report: Suspects not licensed to own guns, Mike Lillis, Hill
- Schumer, Graham: Boston brings urgency to immigration reform, Mike Lillis
- Lawmakers fear gun vote has poisoned the well on immigration reform, Russell Berman and Bernie Becker, Hill
By Chris Strohm – The U.S. House passed cybersecurity legislation backed by companies including
By Meaghan Ziemba – What is contemporary 



