Tag Archives: Developed country

$4.6 Trillion Later, Foreign Aid Remains An Economic Somnolent


By Philip D.Harvey – The governments of the Western industrialized world have provided over $4.6 trillion (in constant 2007 dollars) to the world’s less-developed countries (LDCs) over the past 50 years, the equivalent of several Marshall Plans.

The focus of much foreign aid, especially in the past two decades, has been aid for the purpose of advancing economic development. This part hasn’t worked very well.

Foreign aid is best applied through private channels, for short-term emergencies, and/or for causes that are politically popular almost everywhere, like immunization. Propping up the finances of developing countries’ governments is likely to do more harm than good. more> http://tinyurl.com/8jvwgut

European governments fail to learn from history


BOOK REVIEW

Financial Fiasco, Author: Johan Norberg.

By Johan Norberg – Every politician, central bank, and regulator in the developed world spent 2008 and 2009 saying, “This must never happen again.” “This” was the financial meltdown that almost took down the world economy. They differed in their proposed solutions but held one demand in common: Banks must never again take the kind of highly leveraged risks in exotic securities that were widespread at the tail end of the housing bubble.

In the last chapter of my 2009 book Financial Fiasco, I wrote: “If the government’s capital requirements favor certain ways of holding assets, all banks will hold their assets in those ways, and they will all be struck by the same type of problems at the same time.…After each crisis, the authorities investigate what worked better and then force market players to conform to this ‘best practice.’ All these attempts to make the system as safe as possible really make it extremely sensitive to small blows and changes.”

The problem is not faulty valuations of particular securities; those have been wrong before, and they will be wrong again. The problem is the false conceit that regulators can protect financial markets from risk simply by deciding what is less risky, then getting everybody to march in that one direction. This approach just gives every bank the same weakness. If the defense is breached, everybody will tumble to the ground together. more> http://tinyurl.com/7hybuny